The suit claims the university's student-run law journal's application process is "rigged" to favor minorities.

A conservative legal group sued the University of Michigan’s flagship law journal on Wednesday, claiming its process for ...

The lawsuit claims that the Michigan Law Review uses personal essays as a means to weed out straight white men seeking to ...

FASORP unsuccessfully sued both the NYU Law Review and the Harvard Law Review in 2018, claiming both discriminate against white men when selecting members, editors and articles.

FASORP—whose full name is Faculty, Alumni, & Students Opposed to Racial Preferences—is a voluntary membership organization that litigates against race and sex preferences in academia.

FASORP also has a pending lawsuit against the Northwestern University Law Review regarding discrimination in selection processes. Gene Hamilton, president of America First Legal, wrote in a press ...

The University of Michigan’s (UM) law review journal is allegedly using illegal racial preferencing to achieve a “diverse” board of ...

FASORP previously tried to sue both New York University and Harvard Law Reviews in 2018 for similar claims of discrimination against white men. In both cases they were unsuccessful, ...

FASORP inverts this concept to portray white men as victims, arguing that out of 21 interviews from 2021 to 2024, Northwestern gave offers to only three white men, a rate of 14%.

FASORP sues Michigan Law Review over editor selection processes. Faculty, Alumni, & Students Opposed to Racial Preferences, represented by America First Legal, filed a federal lawsuit against the ...