After a federal trade court struck down President Trump’s sweeping tariffs, his administration is lashing out at the judiciary, specifically judges who rule against the president. The Morning Joe panel reacts to the escalating rhetoric—like calling the ruling a “judicial coup” and a “judicial tyranny”—from White House officials and allies,

A federal judge doubled down on his decision ordering the return of a Guatemalan migrant to the United States after his deportation was found to have lacked due process.

After President Donald Trump began penalizing major law firms that had offended him in one way or another last February, nine of them chose to surrender

A federal judge denied a request from the Department of Homeland Security to reconsider a court order demanding the return of a immigrant who was deported to Guatemala.

The judge in Boston said an order was necessary because “it gives some protection to international students who might be anxious about coming here or anxious about remaining here once they are here.”

The rare prosecution of a sitting judge is teeing up a legal fight over her immunity from criminal charges, and whether the same protections President Donald Trump claimed might apply to judges.

This is not the time for the Supreme Court to greatly weaken the ability of the federal judiciary to stop illegal presidential acts.

Hannah Dugan, the Wisconsin judge accused of impeding government agents during an immigration bust, is seeking to have federal obstruction charges against her dismissed. The post Judge charged with obstructing ICE says SCOTUS ‘presidential immunity’ ruling for Trump ‘did the same for judicial immunity’ and ‘bars’ prosecution first appeared on Law & Crime.